Another Petition, Another GA
Students to Vote on Extending Strike, Minimum Agreement
It’s back to the assembly for Concordia students next week.
Last Friday, undergraduates received notice from the Concordia Student Union that a Special General Meeting will be called for March 26 at 2:00 p.m. on the Reggie’s Terrace, pending the approval of the space from the university.
The second meeting was called after the CSU received a petition—organized by students Tram Bui, Eloise Landry and Gabrielle Provost—to hold another vote on continuing the strike mandate currently in effect.
The agenda for the SGM also includes a call for students to vote on the Minimum Agreement—a series of clauses concerning student solidarity in Quebec.
At last week’s CSU Council meeting, a vote on the MA was shot down for the second time in a matter of months after another round of extensive debate.
Members of Council were essentially split on whether or not to adopt a position that includes a series of provisions that bar signatories from speaking out against the actions of other student groups, refuse to enter negotiations with the government unless all student groups are welcome to the table, and prevent the umbrella groups—which include the FEUQ and ASSE—from making decisions on behalf of its members.
The sticking point for many Concordia Councillors was the non-denunciation clause specifically, where the national student associations agree not to condemn the actions taken by any of the organizations.
Many on council argued that the CSU could not support any violent or illegal acts committed by others, should they occur.
“Regardless of my opinion, students have the right to vote on it,” said CSU President Lex Gill of the MA making the agenda next week.
Previously, students Cassie Smith, Anthony Garoufalis-Auger and CSU Councillor Irmak Bahar had begun circulating a similar petition, but retracted it after speaking with Gill about GA participation at various department and faculty levels.
“Our position is that if the strike continues, it should happen on the faculty level. Renewable GAs seem the like the best way for us to logistically continue the strike,” said Gill. “But we are doing our best to honour the petition we’ve received.”
Gill admitted that the MA specifically is “marginal in the context of broader discourse in the student movement” and that it “doesn’t seem that a huge chunk of students are talking about it—[while] a large part of the student body is talking about the strike.”
Landry and Bui—who’d received nearly 200 signatures on their petition within the first day and a half—agree. The minimum agreement and extending the strike is a decision they maintain needs to be taken up by all students.
“It is important for students to have a position on [the MA],” said Landry, adding that the GA could act as a forum for students to discuss the contract if they don’t know enough about it. “It needs to be up for debate so the GA can have the last word.”
Landry and Bui hope that this time around, the GA will also be better executed, as it will take place in one location, but are unsure how many participants to expect.
“It depends on the students and their motivation to keep being involved in this broader movement,” said Landry.
“This GA was brought up because we heard a lot of students say [this movement] was not [reflecting] democracy, and that they wanted to express themselves and discuss strategies about what will be the most efficient way to block the tuition increase. That is our common goal.”
For the CSU’s part, they claim to have learned from the first GA’s logistical mistakes, and have had meetings to solve some of the problems that led to student frustrations the first time around.
“We’ve been brainstorming solutions to ensure this meeting runs more smoothly, and there’s this consensus that if it’s all going to happen in the same place […] that will hopefully allow people the ability [for more students] to speak,” said Gill.
By commenting on this page you agree to the terms of our Comments Policy.